Saturday, February 15, 2014

Long-Awaited Inspiration: The Tale of Otto and Sandro


        Art is a word that is a world of its own. It encompasses all forms of creative expression; from the physical aspect of dance, to the beautiful aesthetics of a scene comprised of oil on canvas, or simply the written word. These differing acts of art show art’s versatility and timelessness. These methods also offer differing perspectives on central topics; creating a sense of exponentially growing inspiration--all artistic methods using each other to expand their ideas and fearlessly conquer new ones. This innovative mixing of wildly different mediums is part of what makes art so incredible.  Those who can harness various art forms to create whole new ideas and experiences, are those who have truly become experts in the universal ideal of creative expression. One example of two mediums melting together to create a whole new experience, is the orchestral piece, “Three Botticelli Pictures” (1927) composed by Ottorino Respighi, a man who took inspiration from works belonging to one of the masters of the Italian Renaissance, Sandro Botticelli. 
Ottorino Respighi

Sandro Botticelli
          Ottorino Respighi was born July 9, 1879, in Bologna, Italy, only 67.7 miles from Florence, the birthplace of the man whose paintings would one day inspire one of Respighi's most famous works. As a child, Respighi showed great musical promise; his father was a local piano teacher and taught Respighi to play violin, an instrument which he would later go on to play professionally. As a young adult, Respighi attended the Liceo Musicale in Bologna, where he graduated with a diploma in violin performance. Shortly after his time at the Liceo Musicale, Respighi was hired to perform as principal violinist in the orchestra of the Russian Imperial Theatre in St. Petersburg. While in Russia, Respighi became close to Russian composer Nikolai Rimsky-Korsakov (a member of “The Five”, a group of prestigious Russian composers including Mily Balakirev, Cesar Cui, Modest Mussorgsky, and Alexandar Borodin) and studied composition for five months with the talented composer. It was at this point that Respighi realized his passion for writing music, and returned to Bologna’s Liceo Musicale to pursue a diploma in composition.  
Though still an avid performer, Respighi’s compositions began to gain international attention. After moving to Rome to teach composition at the Conservatorio di Santa Cecilia, he created the first of his Roman orchestral tone poems, “Fountains of Rome”. This work contains four movements depicting Roman fountains, and their mysterious allure at different times of day. The piece brings to mind an almost mystical quality, as Respighi describes a dance of sun and water, mixing together with eloquence and grace as stone gods and goddesses watch nearby. This work brought him recognition in the composition world, and ensured his name would forever be engraved in music history. It also spurred his career, and led to a considerable amount of freedom to create and compose whatever he desired; even under the fascist government of Benito Mussolini. For years to come, Respighi would continue to compose, exploring his passion for Italian music and culture by experimenting with the ideas first presented from early composers such as Vivaldi and Marcello, as well as combining more Romantic phrases with Pre-classical dance melodies. His ability to bring a strong sense of story and emotion to his pieces created an unforgettable element of uniqueness which characterize his compositions. It is this emotion and characterization which encompasses “Three Botticelli Pictures” (1927). The paintings, beautiful in themselves, come alive to the sounds of instruments played hundred of years after the figures were even dreamed about; two art forms coming together to create a unique experience and tell an intricate story.
    Travel back a few centuries from the days of Respighi, and you encounter a very different time; the era of the Italian Renaissance, when art, humanism, and antiquity were king, queen, and the entire court. This was the world of artists who are now seen by many to be among the most accomplished in their discipline in all of human history; masters of the canvas including one Sandro Botticelli. Botticelli’s style is what makes his works unique; like many at the time, he primarily focused on the figure itself instead of the background, trying to portray the beauty of the human body. His brushstrokes are careful and meticulous--something which often plays as a contrast to his rich color choices that bring the paintings alive. The ideal of the human figure, exhibited through elongated, elegant bodies, was a specialty for Botticelli who displayed sheer energy in a kind of whimsically exciting yet contrastingly peaceful way. This myriad of feelings that are born when taking in a Botticelli are quite certainly part of their allure, and possibly a factor as to why Respighi was so drawn to them. The three Botticelli pieces which are the stars of Respighi’s “Three Botticelli Pictures” (1927) are three of his most intriguingly beautiful works. The orchestral arrangement features “Primavera” (1482), “The Adoration of the Magi” (1476), and “The Birth of Venus” (1486), all three hosting biblical and mythological images which were a favorite topic of Botticelli’s, as well as many painters during the Italian Renaissance. These paintings are full of mystique and awe, which is evident through Respighi’s musical  composition which was created to accompany them. Together, with 3 three centuries standing between them, Botticelli and Respighi created something incredible--a story of inspiration which crossed hundreds of years and turned itself into something new.
 
Above: “Primavera” (1482)
Below: "Three Botticelli Pictures" (1927)




 
Above: “The Adoration of the Magi” (1476)
Below: "Three Botticelli Pictures" (1927)

 
Above: “The Birth of Venus” (1486)
Below: "Three Botticelli Pictures" (1927)

 Art is a giant willow of inspiration that never ceases to grow and change, each of its branches a new era. It is, as the late great Freddie Mercury once sang “a miracle”; something that connects generations and helps people find their way through life. What is more, it is relateable. It is a swirling picture of ever-changing ideals and sentiments; a map to help you find your way. It is inspiration; the reason a mortal man could reach back three hundred years, pull ideas from the brush of another, and proceed to tweak and twist such ideas to create something totally new. Something that expresses what we have always known, but presented in a way which helps to broaden the way we look at things. 




Sources:

  • "Ottorino Respighi." Wikipedia. Wikimedia Foundation, 02 Aug. 2014. Web. 15 Feb. 2014.
  • "Botticelli." Wikipedia. Wikimedia Foundation, 13 Feb. 2014. Web. 15 Feb. 2014
  • Artble. "Sandro Botticelli." Artble: The Home of Passionate Art Lovers. Artble, n.d. Web. 15 Feb. 2014.
  • Oron, Aryeh. Ottorino Respighi. N.d. Photograph. Bach Cantatas Website. Web. 15 Feb. 2014.
  • Botticelli, Sandro. Primavera. 1482. Uffizi Gallery, Florence, Italy. Wikipedia. Wikimedia Foundation. Web. 15 Feb. 2014.
  • Botticelli, Sandro. Adoration of the Magi. 1476. Uffizi Gallery, Florence, Italy. Wikipedia. Wikimedia Foundation. Web. 15 Feb. 2014.
  • Botticelli, Sandro. Birth of Venus. 1486. Uffizi Gallery, Florence, Italy. Uffizi.org. Uffizi.org, 2013. Web. 15 Feb. 2014.

Tuesday, January 28, 2014

Giverny, France: Monet's Muse

It isn't often when we, the observers and enthusiasts of art, are given the incredible privilege to literally be able to step into the world of an artist's inspiration. However, this is exactly what we are able to do when it comes to the Master of Impressionism, Claude Monet. Though throughout his life Monet took up residence in various esteemed locales in Western Europe (including stints in England and the Netherlands), his favorite and most beloved place of occupancy was that of Giverny, France. It was here in this small village that Monet lived for 43 years of his life. It was also here where he created some of his most famous works, due to the natural allure of his surroundings; luxurious gardens full of flowers and pools which reflect the blue of the sky and the sway of the willows. It is easy to see why such a place caught Monet's artistic eye; why, with brush in hand, he felt so compelled to portray what he saw with his classic medium of choice, oil and canvas. Today, almost 88 years after his passing, Monet's garden and home still remain the same--a tribute to his graceful brilliance. The following are some of Claude Monet's most esteemed works, as well as images of the world which inspired them.


Water Lilies 1906 (One of Monet's 250 piece series spanning form 1897-1926)

Monet, Claude. Water Lilies. 1906. Oil on canvas. Art Institue of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.



Artist's Garden at Giverny 1900 (Notice the tree trunks, which are a distinct feature in each image)

Monet, Claude. Artist's Garden at Giverny. 1900. Oil on canvas. Musée D'Orsay, Paris, France.



Water Lilies and the Japanese Bridge 1897-1899

Monet, Claude. Water Lilies and the Japanese Bridge. 1897-99. Oil on canvas. Princeton University Art Museum, Princeton, New Jersey.








Sources:
  • Cauderlier, Ariane, and Patricia Rynski D'Argence. "Claude Monet's Home in Giverny." Claude Monet's Home in Giverny. Givernet Non for Profit Organisation, n.d. Web. 27 Jan. 2014.
  • Cauderlier, Ariane. Claude Monet Giverny Garden Photo. N.d. Photograph. Giverny Monet's Garden. Givernet Non for Profit Organisation. Web. 27 Jan. 2014.
  • Cauderlier, Ariane. Claude Monet's Home and Garden in Giverny in Spring. N.d. Photograph. Giverny Monet's Garden. Givernet Non for Profit Organisation. Web. 27 Jan. 2014.
  • Cauderlier, Ariane. Water Lilies in Claude Monet's Pond in Giverny. N.d. Photograph. Giverny Monet's Garden. Givernet Non for Profit Organisation. Web. 27 Jan. 2014.
  • "Claude Monet." Wikipedia. Wikimedia Foundation, 20 Jan. 2014. Web. 26 Jan. 2014.



Sunday, January 26, 2014

Obituary: Architectural Treasure Declared DOA

From its distinct look (a facade which seems, to me, greatly reminiscent of Georges Braque's "Mandora"), to the unique medium of its structure (tombasil, an alloy of white bronze never before used in a major architectural endeavor), the former locale of the renowned American Museum of Folk Art is truly a work of genius. Built in 2001 by husband and wife duo Tom Williams and Billie Tsien, the building has won numerous awards and has been praised by architectural professionals as well as lay admirers for the entirety of its 13 years of life; a life that is about to come to a very undignified end at the hands of The Museum of Modern Art. And a wrecking ball.

The Museum of Modern Art has recently announced its decision to demolish its neighboring building, the American Museum of Folk Art; a structure considered by many to be a sculpture capturing the history and culture of the surrounding neighborhood. However, these sentiments seem to mean nothing to the voices of MoMA, who  view the building as a simple plot of land, waiting to be utilized by the modern art giant. With the help of the Architectural Firm of Diller Scofidio + Renfro, MoMA will expand its square footage to cover the land which is now the current home of The American Folk Art building--leaving none of the building's original artistic integrity intact. Though it is true that the wildly popular Museum of Modern Art could use more space in order to combat traffic problems throughout the 630,000 square foot gallery, their blatant disregard of The American Museum of Folk Art, a building which has been called an icon of New York, as well as their refusal to build around and behind the existing structure is a complete disrespect for the sheer beauty and artistry of the building.

The American Museum of Folk Art building embodies the spirit of New York; a place where cultures mix and blend and where diversity is king. The building itself expresses this ideal. It is truly special; a piece of art which epitomizes uniqueness, an acute sense of  handcrafted care, and a monumental majesty. The structure may be small, but its ability to stand out in a city in which hard-and-fast modernity is quickly becoming the norm is something that does not deserve a destructive end--especially when that end is being controlled (ironically) by a world renowned institution of the arts (MoMA)--a place which is supposed to preserve and respect the pieces of art in its care. The question seems to be as follows: has MoMA been taken over by the idea of "bigger is better" and lost its artist's perspective? Have its ideals of creativity and individuality been taken over by those of profit and size?


The American Museum of Folk Art building is art. It is a monument. You wouldn't paint over a DaVinci. You shouldn't build over a Williams and Tsien. It is my opinion that to tear down such a inspiring structure would be a crime against artistic creativity, and a win for the germ of homogeneity which  has begun to infiltrate the body of architecture under a false identity of "modernity".









Sources:
  • Williams, Tod, and Billie Tsien. "Regarding the Folk Art Museum." Tod Williams Billie Tsien Architects. N.p., 8 Jan. 2014. Web. 26 Jan. 2014.
  • Williams, Tod, and Billie Tsien. "Selection of Awards." Tod Williams Billie Tsien Architects. N.p., n.d. Web. 26 Jan. 2014.
  •  Goldberger, Paul. "Friendly Fire on the Culture Front? Why the Museum of Modern Art Is Making a Fatal Mistake." Vanity Fair. Conde Nast, 8 Jan. 2014. Web. 26 Jan. 2014.
  • "American Folk Art Museum." Wikipedia. Wikimedia Foundation, 23 Jan. 2014. Web. 26 Jan. 2014.
  • Williams, Todd, and Billie Tsien. "American Folk Art MuseumTod Williams Billie Tsien." American Folk Art Museum. Arcspace, 03 Mar. 2003. Web. 26 Jan. 2014.
  • Lowry, Glenn D., and Diller Scofidio + Renfro. "BUILDING FOR THE FUTURE: A WORK IN PROGRESS." MoMA. The Museum of Modern Art, n.d. Web. 26 Jan. 2014.
  • Pogrebin, Robin. "Critics Voice Objections to MoMA’s Plan to Take Down Folk Art Museum." ArtsBeat Critics Voice Objections to MoMAs Plan to Take Down Folk Art Museum Comments. New York Times, 9 Jan. 2014. Web. 26 Jan. 2014.
  • Structuretone. American Folk Art Museum. N.d. Photograph. New York, New York. Structuretone. Structure Tone, 2013. Web. 26 Jan. 2014. <http://www.structuretone.com/st/index.nsf/O/AmericanFolkArtMuseum?OpenDocument&>.